Microfinance as a Potential Catalyst for Improved Sanitation

Sanitation microfinance has the potential to sustainably improve sanitation access in developing countries. Due to resource limitations, subsidy-based sanitation programs are typically unable to provide desirable sanitation products. This, among other factors, has frequently resulted in abandoned infrastructure and ineffective investment. Microfinance provides the possibility for middle- and lower-income households to invest in a desirable sanitation product that meets their long-term needs and preferences through market-based structures.

Water For People has been piloting various sanitation microfinance models with diverse partners in seven countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, India, Malawi, Peru, Rwanda and Uganda). Based on these experiences, this study investigates how best to design and implement sanitation microfinance programs and the merits and pitfalls of microfinance itself. Additionally, the study highlights common findings from Water For People’s experience with sanitation microfinance in seven countries.

Read full report here.

Our numbers are based off the following data:

Fill out my online form.

Please note:

Our site is meant to function in the latest versions of the major browsers, both on the desktop and mobile operating systems. Internet Explorer versions 9 and older are not supported by this site. To see this site in its intended state, we recommend choosing another browser (such as Chrome).

The last version of Internet Explorer was version 11. Now Microsoft is pushing 'Edge'. Older versions of IE aren't even supported by Microsoft anymore. This article is a bit dated, but is a quick read and helps to explain why you really should upgrade: Please Upgrade Your Browser. Essentially, dated browsers are a huge risk for the user.

Alternatively, if you don't feel like upgrading your browser, you can also use our full site on your phone.


Why Don't We Fix Our Site for X Browser?

Essentially, Water For People is a non-profit and we would rather spend money on our causes instead of the very significant amount of money that it would cost us to design and maintain a website that works for legacy, unsupported browsers.